ConflictEuropeNorth AmericaPoliticsTechnologyWarWorld

U.S. worries deepen as adversaries team up to challenge dominance

U.S. President Joe Biden and Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy during the launching of the Ukraine Compact at the 2024 NATO Summit in Washington in July | Getty Images / via Bloomberg

 

For months, the U.S. has warned Iran not to send ballistic missiles to Russia and told China not to provide military components for Moscow’s war in Ukraine.

But Iran is now doing just what Washington said not to and China is pushing the line. Indeed, the U.S. and its allies are increasingly worried by the speed and intensity with which the three, along with North Korea, are deepening ties to challenge American dominance despite facing some of the most sweeping sanctions the West has ever imposed, according to officials who asked not to be identified discussing matters that are not public.

The defiance fits a pattern of what outside experts — and increasingly, U.S. and allied officials — see as the growing struggle Washington faces as its seeks to get what it wants around the world.

The examples, they say, are legion.

Venezuela’s authoritarian leader brushed aside a months long U.S. push for free and fair elections and remains in office after a vote widely seen as rigged. A Washington-led naval coalition has so far failed to lift a Houthi rebel chokehold that’s crippled shipping in the Red Sea. Washington and its allies have been pushed out of bases in Africa as China and Russia expand their reach. Beijing has only stepped up its aggression in the South China Sea.

Then there are the allies. Washington finds itself unable to cajole Israel into a cease-fire deal with Hamas.

“U.S. influence is waning, and it’s waning rapidly,” said Martin Kimani, former Kenyan ambassador to the U.N. and director of NYU’s Center on International Cooperation. “There are rising powers that want to assert themselves more within the multilateral space — from China to others — and the Global South increasingly has a voice.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with head of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic on Aug. 20.
Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with head of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic on Aug. 20. | Sputnik / AFP-JIJI / VIA Getty Images

That’s the reality President Joe Biden faces as joins more than 140 other world leaders in New York for the annual meeting of the United Nations General Assembly.

The meeting is likely to underscore how the U.S. often finds itself on the backfoot as other powers gain influence.

Some 40 nations that voted to condemn Russia for its invasion of Ukraine last year decided to abstain on a similar motion in July. A majority of them are countries that have been vocal on the Palestinian cause, including Brazil, Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

For its part, the Biden administration takes credit for assembling an alliance of more than two dozen nations supporting Ukraine in its efforts to turn back Russia’s invasion. In the Middle East, officials argue their efforts have helped limit the spread of a conflict that risks turning into a regional conflagration. They also blame Hamas, whose Oct. 7 terrorist attack triggered Israel’s invasion of Gaza, for blocking the cease-fire.

But Washington’s strong support for Israel’s war against Hamas is draining its diplomatic currency, Kimani said. U.S. pressure for a cease-fire so far has yielded few results despite regular trips to the region by top administration officials.

Also gathering in New York this week will be officials from the BRICS, which has grown to nine members, including some U.S. allies, as well as Iran and founders Russia and China. More countries are applying to join a group that’s explicitly called for creating an alternative center of global influence, including rivals to the U.S. dollar’s dominance.

Countries outside the orbits of the U.S. and its rivals “are seeing this new node of power emerging. It probably contributes to them staying in between both poles, contributing to a multi polarity in the world,” said Nadia Schadlow, a former top official in the administration of Donald Trump and now a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. “The U.S. now has to manage that more effectively, which is hard.”

 

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a meeting in Tehran on Saturday.
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a meeting in Tehran on Saturday. | Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader / WANA / via REUTERS

 

At the same time, domestic politics in the U.S. and Europe is pulling capitals away from international commitments, as populist leaders pushing for more isolationist policies find growing support.

Moscow, meanwhile, is deepening relationships as it shares more sensitive military knowhow with Beijing, Tehran and Pyongyang in return for their war aid. That process has accelerated as the Kremlin’s invasion of Ukraine drags toward a fourth year.

“There is a perception in both China and Russia that the United States and the West are in inevitable decline,” said Andrea Kendall-Taylor, a former senior U.S. intelligence official now at the Center for a New American Security. “Now they see the momentum moving in their favor and so they’re willing to lean in and take more risk in order to accelerate that decline.”

Trump has sought to exploit the chaos, saying under his leadership Russia would have never invaded Ukraine and Hamas wouldn’t have attacked Israel. But experts and analysts say the problem is deeper than that.

Officially, the U.S. adversaries deny sharing weapons and technology. But Russian President Vladimir Putin dispatched a top aide to North Korea and Tehran — after talks in Russia with a senior Chinese official — this month and announced plans for a sweeping new strategic pact with Iran.

Wave after wave of U.S. sanctions on all those countries haven’t stopped the trade. China is finding ways to supply Russia 90% of the chips its needs to produce missiles, tanks and aircraft, according to the Hudson Institute.

U.S. restrictions also haven’t deterred Russia, Iran and China from attempting to the meddle in the November presidential election. American officials have accused all three of elaborate efforts to use hacking, disinformation and other means to influence the vote, although the adversaries deny those charges.

A senior U.S. official said sanctions, while not 100% effective, have complicated the adversaries’ efforts to cooperate, adding to the economic cost of defying Washington. And for China, the official said, deeper links between Russia and North Korea are likely to spur closer ties between the U.S. and its allies in the region, something Beijing is unlikely to welcome.

Chinese leader Xi Jinping at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing in 2022
Chinese leader Xi Jinping at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing in 2022 | Bloomberg

China’s deep integration into the U.S.-dominated global financial system and reliance on international trade may also limit how far it’s willing to go in defying the U.S.

But even as the U.S. has rekindled ties with allies to support Ukraine, it’s also growing increasingly hard to get European allies on board with additional sets of measures on the heavily sanctioned countries.

Italy, for instance, still hasn’t agreed to implement sanctions on Iran Air pushed for by the U.S. in response to it sending Russia ballistic missiles, according to a senior diplomat familiar with the matter. And while Brussels has taken a sharper line on China, heavier sanctions in response to Russia aid could be challenging to agree given European companies’ deep business ties there.

Ultimately, the U.S. and its allies hope their cooperation, rooted in shared democratic values, can still carry weight around the world.

Russia and China’s alignment with North Korea and Iran “is of a completely profoundly different quality to the type of relationship that we have,” Richard Moore, head of Britain’s MI6 Secret Intelligence Service, said earlier this month, speaking of British collaboration with the U.S. and Europe.

“The thing that’s driving it — the cooperation between Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea — is not based on shared values,” he said. “It’s on a sort of rather dark and more pragmatic basis.

 

Related Articles

Back to top button